Sign up for Free | Read More Articles | Create A New Blog | Search News Jungle Blogs | Members | Login | Join Help Recycle | List Your Feed


Who will be the Next President of the United States?

? Nov. 29, 2007 - Help Recycle has joined News Jungle

We would like to welcome Help Recycle.com, members and friends to News Jungle Blogosphere. News Jungle
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 15, 2005 - Bush calls Iraq election major step forward

Who Will be the Next President? Read on at Newsjungle.com

Bush calls Iraq election major step forward
16 Dec 2005 00:22:23 GMT
Source: Reuters

By Steve Holland

WASHINGTON, Dec 15 (Reuters) - Standing with Iraqis whose ink-stained fingers showed they voted, President George W. Bush said Iraq´s election on Thursday was a big step to meeting U.S. goals and he hoped it would send a message to Iran and Syria.

Faced with wide U.S. public disapproval of his Iraq strategy and eager to show any progress, Bush hailed the millions of Iraqis who voted for "defying the terrorists and refusing to be cowed into not voting."

"There´s a lot of joy as far as I´m concerned in seeing the Iraqi people accomplish this major milestone on the march to democracy," Bush said.

He appeared in the Oval Office with five Iraqi Americans who voted at ballot places in the United States and who had ink-stained fingers to indicate they had voted.

Bush is under mounting pressure from Americans to show progress in Iraq that will enable a reduction in U.S. troops next year.

"This is a major step forward in achieving our objective" of a democratic Iraq and ally in the Middle East, Bush said. He hoped Iraq´s example would "send such a powerful example to others in the region, whether they live in Iran or Syria for example."

Washington says Iran and Syria are interfering with a drive to end the Iraqi insurgency and create a democratic Iraq.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, an architect of a war fought over unproved allegations that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, called the election "a defeat for the enemies of the Iraqi people."

"It constituted a defeat to the people who have been doing the beheading, and conducting the suicide raids, and threatening people and assassinating people," he said.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the Iraqi people had shown their commitment to democracy against great odds butcautioned that a successful election was an incremental step forward.

"They´ve still got a ways to go and we keep our fingers crossed because the terrorists have every rason to want to disrupt what is happening here," Rice said on Fox News.

CUTTING TROOP LEVELS

There are now about 155,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, but the United States plans to reduce the force, recently bolstered to help protect elections, down to the usual level of about 137,000 early next year.

Going lower than that would depend on the security situation.

Twenty-four House Democrats, including Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland and 11 members of the Armed Services Committee, said in a letter to Bush that the elections gave the United States the chance to reduce its involvement in Iraq.

The letter said the U.S. military presence "should decrease significantly in the next 12 months" and its role should be limited to isolating and defeating foreign terrorists there.

Iraq must take responsibility for defeating domestic security threats, the Democrats said, and the United States "must not be a proxy in an Iraqi civil war" if Sunni and Baathist violence against the government continues.

The election is expected to pave the way for establishing a permanent government. The U.S. ambassador in Baghdad, Zalmay Khalilzad, told Reuters: "Since no single party will have a majority there will be a need for a very broad-based coalition."

But the determining factor for the Bush administration in bringing home U.S. troops is whether Iraqi forces are sufficiently trained to fight the insurgency.

"There is still lots of tough work to do and we should expect the insurgency not to just go away because there were elections," said U.S. Army Gen. George Casey, commander of U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq, in remarks piped into the Pentagon from Iraq.

U.S. officials believed the turnout was higher than the 10 million who voted in the October constitutional referendum in Iraq, and they thought that more disaffected Sunni Arabs had voted than previously. (Additional reporting by Charles Aldinger, Caren Bohan and Vicki Allen)

 

This is some interesting news... 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 5, 2005 - Miss. Republican Seeks More Hurricane Aid

Who Will be the Next President?

Miss. Republican Seeks More Hurricane Aid

Dec 5, 7:50 PM (ET)
By ANDREW TAYLOR

(AP) A damaged railroad crossing sign lies among the debris in front of a home damaged by Hurricane...
Full Image

WASHINGTON (AP) - In a power play that could expose rifts within the Republican Party and between the White House and Congress, the chairman of the Senate Appropriations panel is pushing to more than double President Bush's latest request for hurricane relief.

Thad Cochran, a veteran Republican from hurricane-ravaged Mississippi, would add more than $18 billion to the $17 billion request submitted by Bush in October. Congress is likely to pass more hurricane relief before adjourning later this month.

Cochran's plan would add $11.5 billion to Bush's $1.5 billion request for Community Development Block Grants to help Katrina, chiefly to help homeowners without flood insurance rebuild or repair their homes. Many homes outside areas traditionally vulnerable to floods - and therefore not insured against Katrina's massive flood surge - were destroyed.

"This would be money for homes that were not in the flood plain but that had flood damage or were destroyed," said Cochran spokeswoman Jenny Manley. "About 30,000 homes (in Mississippi) are eligible."

Cochran would also provide about $4 billion for agriculture disasters across the country, a move that could build political support for the entire relief package. He would also double, to $1 billion, grants for social services such as child care. His proposal is still in draft form.

Whatever Katrina relief is finally agreed to is likely to be added to the must-pass defense budget currently in House-Senate negotiations.

But the plan is likely to encounter stiff resistance from House GOP leaders and conservatives worried that hurricane-related spending is padding the deficit. They are likely to seek to hew more closely to Bush's request to use $17 billion already approved for hurricane relief for new purposes, such as rebuilding highways, levees and federal facilities damaged by the storms.

The White House isn't commenting on Cochran's plan, saying that the pending request is sufficient for now and that a more comprehensive plan will be submitted next year.

"We urge Congress to act on this latest request as quickly as possible to help further the recovery effort," said Scott Milburn, spokesman for the White House budget office. "The latest request is the right approach for this stage of the recovery, but a request for additional funds is expected after the turn of the year."

Gulf state lawmakers, however, are unhappy with the pace of the recovery effort and are worried that some of the momentum felt in the immediate aftermath of the storms has faded.

Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., issued a statement Friday criticizing the recovery effort and asking Bush to redouble the flood relief effort.

"We've dusted ourselves off and are working to restore our infrastructure and residential and business tax base," Lott said. "We need your leadership to ensure that the federal government fulfills its commitment to help Mississippians get back on their feet."

In September, Congress passed two bills providing $62 billion in emergency monies for hurricane relief, mostly to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. That money has been used for near-term recovery efforts such as clearing debris, providing temporary housing and direct aid to individuals.

As it turns out, the White House overestimated the pace of spending. About $37 billion in uncommitted funds remain in FEMA coffers.

The major items in the pending White House request include:

- $6.6 billion for the Pentagon to repair military facilities such as the Keesler air base and the Naval Air Station in New Orleans, repair Navy ships and to pay the costs of military deployments to the region.

- $2.2 billion to the Housing and Urban Development Department to restore housing units for low-income Gulf Coast residents, provide rental assistance and give poor families ownership of rehabilitated federal housing stock.

- $2.4 billion for transportation-related needs such as repairing highways and airport control towers.

- $1.6 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers to repair levees, flood control and navigation projects.

- $1.4 billion to replace the VA medical centers in New Orleans and Biloxi, to replace medication, supplies and equipment for the hospitals and their clinics and to repair damaged national cemeteries.

Separately, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., has requested another $1.1 billion in additional spending for border security, mostly to upgrade Customs and Border Protection air fleet.

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 5, 2005 - DeLay: Victory in Iraq Is 'Our Choice'

 Who Will be the Next President?  

DeLay: Victory in Iraq Is 'Our Choice'

Dec 4, 12:40 AM (ET)
By JUAN A. LOZANO

HOUSTON (AP) - Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay told a group of soldiers Saturday night that withdrawing troops from Iraq now would be "a death warrant for Americans in future terrorist attacks."

"Iraq right now is the central front on the war on terror, whether we like it or not," DeLay told about 200 soldiers and their families at a banquet held in their honor. "Our choice is not between different visions of victory but between victory and surrender. Only one choice is worth the legacy of the United States and the heroes she has lost in this conflict. Victory is our choice."

At least one protester stood outside during Saturday night's event, holding up a sign criticizing DeLay's stance on the war and calling for troops to come home.

Calls to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq gained momentum last month when Democratic Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a decorated Vietnam veteran and longtime military supporter, called for a change of direction, saying continued military action in Iraq isn't in the best interests of the United States.

Republican Rep. Jean Schmidt of Ohio added fuel to the fire when she said on the House floor that she had a message for Murtha from a Marine: "Cowards cut and run, Marines never do." The comment caused an uproar, and other Democrats have since echoed Murtha's concerns.

On Saturday, DeLay said talk of troop withdrawal by Democrats, whom he described as the "cut and run caucus," was the wrong thing to do.

"America is America because we don't quit in the face of overwhelming odds," the Texas Republican said. He said Iraqi elections and increasing numbers of U.S.-trained Iraqi troops are signs of success.

The banquet was sponsored by the nonprofit Impact Player Partners, which brings troops together with celebrities, to honor members of the 451st Civil Affairs Battalion, an Army Reserve unit based outside Houston.

Houston Astros pitcher Roger Clemens was among those thanking the soldiers and their families for their hard work and sacrifice.

"You guys are not forgotten in what you do," Clemens said.

At least 185 Texas service members and more than 2,100 U.S. troops in all have died since the war began in March 2003, according to the Department of Defense.

DeLay made no mention of his ongoing legal battles. He was indicted in a campaign finance investigation, accused of illegally funneling corporate donations to Texas candidates. He denies the charges against him

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 5, 2005 - DeLay's Money Laundering Charges Upheld! Very Very interesting News

DeLay's Money Laundering Charges Upheld

Dec 5, 8:29 PM (ET)
By APRIL CASTRO

(AP) Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Texas, and his wife, Christine, arrive for a court appearance in Austin, Texas,...
Full Image

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - A judge dismissed a conspiracy charge Monday against Rep. Tom DeLay but refused to throw out the far more serious allegations of money-laundering, dashing the congressman's hopes for now of reclaiming his post as House majority leader.

Texas Judge Pat Priest, who is presiding over the case against the Republican, issued the ruling after a hearing late last month in which DeLay's attorney argued that the indictment was fatally flawed.

When he was indicted in September, DeLay was required under House rules to relinquish the leadership post he had held since 2003. While Monday's ruling was a partial victory for DeLay, he cannot reclaim his post because he remains under indictment.

The ruling means the case will move toward a trial next year, though other defense objections to the indictments remain to be heard by the judge.

"The court's decision to dismiss Ronnie Earle's numerous charges against Mr. DeLay underscores just how baseless and politically motivated the charges were," DeLay spokesman Kevin Madden said, referring to the Democratic district attorney who brought the case.

"Mr. DeLay is very encouraged by the swift progress of the legal proceedings and looks forward to his eventual and absolute exoneration based on the facts and the law."

After the judge's decision, DeLay declined to speak with reporters as he entered a Houston hotel for a campaign fundraiser.

In a written statement, Earle's office said prosecutors were studying the ruling and had made no decision about whether to appeal. Prosecutors have 15 days to challenge the decision.

DeLay, 58, and two GOP fundraisers, John Colyandro and Jim Ellis, are accused of illegally funneling $190,000 in corporate donations to 2002 Republican candidates for the Texas Legislature. Under Texas law, corporate money cannot be directly used for political campaigns, but it can be used for administrative purposes.

In asking that the case be thrown out, DeLay lawyer Dick DeGuerin argued that one of the charges - conspiracy to violate the Texas election code - did not even take effect until September 2003, a year after the alleged offenses occurred.

Prosecutors, however, said the crime of conspiracy was already on the books, and could be applied to the election code even though such uses were not explicitly in state law at the time.

The judge was unpersuaded by that argument, and dismissed the conspiracy charge. But the judge upheld charges of money laundering and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Those charges involve an alleged attempt by DeLay to conceal the source of the campaign contributions by funneling the money through his own political action committee and then an arm of the Republican National Committee.

In trying to have those charges thrown out, the defense argued that the Texas money laundering law does not apply to funds in the form of a check, just coins or paper money. But the judge said that checks "are clearly funds and can be the subject of money laundering."

The defense attorneys also argued that the definition of money laundering in Texas involves the transfer of criminal proceeds. Because the money in this case was not illegal to begin with, they argued, money laundering never occurred.

But the judge rejected that argument, saying the money became suspect when "it began to be held with the prohibited intent."

He said if prosecutors can prove that DeLay and his associates obtained the corporate donations "with the express intent of converting those funds to the use of individual candidates," or that they converted money legally collected by sending it to the Republican National Committee and asking for the same amount to be sent back to Texas candidates, "then they will have established that money was laundered."

"The money would have become 'dirty money' at the point that it began to be held with the prohibited intent," Priest wrote.

Conspiracy to violate the election code carries up to two years in prison. Money laundering is punishable by five years to life. Conspiracy to commit money laundering carries two years.

The alleged campaign-finance scheme had far-reaching political effects: With DeLay's fundraising muscle, the GOP took control of the Texas House for the first time in 130 years, then pushed through a congressional redistricting plan engineered by DeLay that resulted in more Texas Republicans going to Congress.

At the court hearing last month, DeLay's lawyers asked for a quick decision on their request for a dismissal, and, if the ruling went against DeLay, a prompt trial, in hopes that he could regain his leadership post by the time the House reconvenes in late January. But the judge said at the time that it was unlikely the case would go to trial before the first of the year.

Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri became majority leader when DeLay stepped aside.

The judge has yet to rule on a defense bid to move DeLay's trial out of liberal, Democratic-leaning Austin and allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. DeGuerin accused the district attorney of shopping the DeLay case around to different grand juries until he found one that would indict the congressman.

The case ended up before Priest, a Democrat, after DeLay's attorneys had a previous judge removed for contributing to Democratic candidates and causes. Priest has made few political contributions over the years.

The judge acted as a CNN-USA Today/Gallup poll showed that DeLay's political standing has weakened considerably in his home district around Houston.

The survey found that 49 percent of registered voters questioned said they are more likely to vote for a Democratic challenger than for DeLay in 2006, and 36 percent said they would be more likey to vote for DeLay.

Former Democratic Rep. Nick Lampson is planning to challenge DeLay in the 2006 elections.

The survey also found that 55 percent of registered voters said that the charges that DeLay broke campaign finance laws are definitely or probably true, while 34 percent said they were probably or definitely not true.

 

http://story.news.ask.com//article/20051206/D8EAEJ1G0.html

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 5, 2005 - Rice: U.S. Terror Policy Tough, but Legal

 

Rice: U.S. Terror Policy Tough, but Legal

By ANNE GEARAN, AP Diplomatic Writer

BERLIN -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice aggressively defended U.S. tactics against terrorism on Monday as tough but legal, and countered European complaints over reports of secret CIA-run prisons there by saying America's efforts with its allies have been "a two-way street" that have saved European and American lives.

Commencing a five-day visit to a Europe that has seethed with resentment over the reports of U.S. prisons and detainee mistreatment, Rice delivered the Bush administration's most forceful response to a month of growing trans-Atlantic acrimony.

She also went further than others in the Bush administration to insist that Americans do not practice torture or lesser forms of cruel treatment.

"Our people, wherever they are, are operating under U.S. law and U.S. international obligations," Rice said. She said that includes the U.N. Convention Against Torture, a document the administration has previously said does not fully apply to Americans overseas.

"Some governments choose to cooperate with the United States" in intelligence and other arenas, Rice said before she left for Europe. "That cooperation is a two-way street. We share intelligence that has helped protect European countries from attack, saving European lives."

Her comments seemed to imply that if any European governments provided secret prisons, they did so willingly.

Rice did not elaborate on how lives were saved. But White House spokesman Scott McClellan referred reporters to an Oct. 6 statement by President Bush that the United States and its allies had foiled 10 serious plots by the al-Qaida terror network in the past four years.

At the time, the White House said those counted several attempted strikes in Europe, including plans to bomb sites in Britain in mid-2004, attack London's Heathrow Airport using hijacked commercial airliners in 2003 and carry out a large-scale bombing in Britain in spring 2004.

Throughout Monday, Rice refused any outright answer to the underlying question European governments have asked: Did the United States run clandestine detention sites on the continent?

"Were I to confirm or deny, say yes or say no, then I would be compromising intelligence information, and I'm not going to do that," she said on her plane to Germany.

The European Union has asked for an explanation of U.S. actions, as have individual European allies concerned that their airports, territory or air space may have been used for detention or transport of suspects under conditions illegal in Europe. The continent's top human rights watchdog is investigating.

In Berlin, a government spokesman said Monday that Germany would ask Rice about its list of more than 400 flights and landings in Germany by planes suspected of being used by the CIA.

The European Union's justice commissioner says covert prisons and detainee mistreatment would violate European human rights law, and he warned last week that any host countries could lose voting rights in the powerful 25-nation bloc.

A November report in The Washington Post said that the CIA ran a network of hidden prisons, including some in Eastern European democracies. The story and its aftermath have rekindled opposition to President Bush and his foreign policy in Europe and have threatened to fray diplomatic ties that Rice has tried to forge this year.

The advocacy group Human Rights Watch followed the news report with claims that it has tracked suspicious CIA flights around Europe since the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan. The group pointed to sites in Poland and Romania as probable hosts for secret prisons, but both those nations have denied it.

Rice's trip was planned before the controversy broke, and her words Monday were an attempt to keep the issue from completely overshadowing her other business. She put the onus to articulate terrorism policies partly on the shoulders of European allies who also are threatened by al-Qaida.

At the same time, she made the point that aggressive work to counter potential terrorists can be uncomfortable for democracies.

"The captured terrorists of the 21st century do not fit easily into traditional systems of criminal or military justice," she said. "We need to adapt."

Information gathered by U.S. intelligence agencies from a "very small number of extremely dangerous detainees" has helped prevent terrorist attacks in several countries, Rice said.

"The United States has fully respected the sovereignty of other countries that have cooperated in these matters," she said. "The United States is a country of laws."

Rice's itinerary Tuesday includes a stop in Romania where, by chance, she is to sign a defense agreement related to the military base identified by Human Rights Watch.

Bush has said the United States does not allow torture, but the administration has permitted harsh interrogation techniques at the Guantanamo Bay military prison camp and elsewhere that human rights organizations say violate the U.N. treaty. One widely cited method is "waterboarding," in which prisoners are strapped to a plank and dunked repeatedly.

The 1994 treaty obligates nations to try to prevent cruelty that does not meet the legal definition of torture. Vice President Dick Cheney has led a lobbying effort against an attempt by Sen. John McCain to expressly forbid such practices under U.S. law.

Human rights organizations and legal groups, both in the U.S. and abroad, have also accused the United States of allowing a practice known as "rendition to torture," in which suspects are taken to countries such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia where harsh interrogation methods are used.

Rice denied it.

"The United States does not use the air space or airport of any country for the purpose of transporting a detainee when we believe he or she will be tortured," she said.

That declaration was welcomed by British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. He said, "All of us must work together -- within the rule of law -- to use every tool at out disposal to deal with the threat of terrorism."

* __

On the Net:

State Department: http://www.state.gov

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/wire/ats-ap_top14dec05,0,1562826.story

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 2, 2005 - Act Blue Link to donate.

Who Will be the Next President?

Here is another test link to actblue! 

 

 

 

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 2, 2005 - Checkout this link from act Blue

Who Will be the Next President?
The Politically Correct Corner

My contribution: $
Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 2, 2005 - http://www.actblue.com/ Democratic Networking Website

Who Will be the Next President?

Looking to Start a Grass Root Campaign or just looking for some friends to help with your election?

 

http://www.actblue.com/

Fundraise for Democrats.

At ActBlue, you can use key online techniques of MoveOn.org, EMILY's List and others to fundraise for the Democratic candidate or candidates of your choice.

1. Choose your candidates.

  • Select from among all the Democratic candidates for House and Senate.
  • You'll get your own web page where visitors can contribute to your chosen candidates — completely customizable with your own text advocating for them. Examples

2. Recruit your friends.

  • Send your family, friends, neighbors and colleagues a link to the page — and they can contribute right then and there.
  • Track how many donors and dollars you've recruited to the candidates most important to you.
  • Throw a House Party to fundraise for your candidates! Learn More...

Checkout all these features on http://actblue.com

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Dec. 2, 2005 - Advoing the Primaries: Article From Politics1.com

Who Will be the Next President?

AVOIDING PRIMARIES? Republicans leaders in three key states -- Ohio, Illinois and New York -- are trying to narrow gubernatorial primary fields to improve chances of victories in general elections next year. In Ohio, the AP reported that longtime State GOP Chair Bob Bennett and other leaders know their party is already gravely wounded by term-limited Governor Bob Taft's (R) dismal performance. That's why they want to avoid a three-way primary next year May between a trio of the state's top Republican officials. Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, Attorney General Jim Petro and State Auditor Betty Montgomery are announced candidates for Governor, and Republicans would love it if two of them would exit the contest in favor of other races. Ohio Democrats this week largely rallied behind the gubernatorial campaign of Congressman Ted Strickland (D) when Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman dropped out. In Illinois, former Governor Jim Edgar and other state GOP leaders there are trying to narrow the gubernatorial field in favor of State Treasurer Judy Topinka. According to the Chicago Tribune, State GOP Chair Andrew McKenna "wants the five current candidates for governor to meet with him Friday and review results of new polling that could raise questions about the viability of some of their campaigns." Topinka's two leading primary rivals, wealthy businessman Ron Gidwitz and State Senator Steve Rauschenberger, vow they will not be forced from the race. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich still may face minor primary opposition, but is assured of being his party's nominee. Meanwhile, in New York, Republican county chairs are already set to meet December 12 to endorse candidates for Governor and US Senate. Governor George Pataki (R) and his allies were behind the move in an effort to endorse former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld as the candidate for Governor and Westchester County D.A. Jeanine Pirro as the candidate for US Senate. Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and incumbent US Senator Hillary Clinton are assured of being the Dem nominees for Governor and US Senate next year. Those plans seem to be unraveling as State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno, Congressman John Sweeney and others are attempting to derail the meeting in order to advance the odds of billionaire businessman Tom Golisano for the Governor race and former Yonkers Mayor John Spencer in the US Senate contest. This anti-Pataki faction would also like to steer Pirro into the open Attorney General's race. This "avoid primaries" strategy isn't unique to Republicans. Florida Democrats, for example, would like to find a way to avoid a Jim Davis-Rod Smith gubernatorial primary by steering the two men into running together as a team for Gov and Lt Gov.

We at thwe Politically Correct Corner found this very interesting.  These guys are just holding on for the ride!

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - Stop Globalization Joke and Picture

Who Will be the Next President?

xed0006.gif

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - Microsft Versus GM To Big Influential Companies

Microsoft VS. GM

At a recent computer expo (1996 COMDEX), Bill Gates compared the computer industry to the automotive indusrty by stating: "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving cars that cost $25.00 and get 1,00 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bills comment, General Motors issued A press release making the following statement: "If we (GM) had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1) for no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice per day.

2) Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3) Your car would occasionally stop on the freeway without reason. In order to get started again, you would have to pull off to the side of the road, close all the windowsshut off the car resart it and open all the windows again. For some unknown reason, you would simply do this without question.

4) Occasionally, executing a maneuver, such as a left turn, would cause your car to shut down and refuse to resart, in which case you would have to re-install the engine.

5) Only one person could use the car at one time unless you bought "Car95" or "CarNT", but then you would also have to buy more seats.

6) The new seats you would need would force everyone to have the same size butt.

7) You would press the "start" button to shut off the engine.

8) The oil warning light, water warning light, and alternator warning light would all be replaced by a single "Unidentified System Error" light.

9) The air bag would ask ur freshly mangled body "are you sure" before going off.

10) Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you back inuntill you simultaneously lifted the driver side door handle, turned the key, and grabbed the radio antenna.

11) The radio antenna would be internally mounted on the passenger side of the car.

12) buying a new car would force you to also purchase a new set of Deluxe Rand McNally road maps, dispite the fact that you niether need nor want them. Attempting to delet this otion would immediately cause your cars performance to diminish by 50% or more.

13) every time GM introduced a new car, people would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the old controls would function in the new car.

14) Macintosh would make a car that was five times faster, ten times more reliable and easier to mantain, twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads."

 

This is Why Microsoft makes such a Good target!

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - Frenetic Wanderings. Hey Baby did you fall from Heaven?

Who Will be the Next President?

 

yheavenfellcolor.gif

Every man´s Worst Dream!  Asking me out!

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - Funny Article I read about "Tennis Elbow" Funny Joke

Who Will be the Next President?

Diagnosis

One day, Pete complained to his friend, "My elbow really hurts. I guess I should see a doctor."

His friend said, "Don't do that. There's a computer at the drug store that can diagnose anything quicker and cheaper than a doctor.

Simply put in a sample of your urine, and the computer will diagnose your problem and tell you what you can do about and it will only costs you $10.00."

Pete figured he had nothing to lose, so he filled a jar with a urine sample and went to the drug store. Finding the computer, he poured in the sample and deposited the $10.00.

The computer started making some noise and various lights started flashing. After a brief pause, out popped a small slip of paper which read:

1. You have tennis elbow.
2. Soak your arm in warm water, avoid heavy labor.
3. It will be better in two weeks.......

That evening while thinking how amazing this new technology was and how it would change medical science forever, he began to wonder if this computer could be fooled.

He decided to give it a try. He mixed together some tap water, a stool sample from his dog, and urine samples from his wife and daughter. To top it off, he masturbated into the concoction.

He went back to the drug store, located the computer, poured in the sample and deposited the $10.00. The machine again made the usual noises, flashed its alights, and printed out the following analysis:

1. Your tap water is too hard.
2. Get a water softener.
3. Your dog has ringworm.
4. Bathe him with anti-fungal shampoo.
5. Your daughter is using cocaine.
6. Put her in a rehabilitation clinic.
7. Your wife is pregnant ....... twin girls. They aren't yours. Get a lawyer.
8. And if you don't stop masturbating, your elbow will never get better

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - Funny Jokes about a Dad explaining politics.

A kid goes to his dad and asks, "Dad, what are politics?"

His dad replies, " Put it this way; I am the breadwinner of the family so I am capatilism. Your mom is the owner of the money so she is government. The government is the provider for the people so you are the people. Your baby brother will be the future, and the nanny is the working class. Now think about that."

So he went to bed. He was woken by his brother. The baby had pooped in his daiper. He went to tell his parents, but he only found his mom asleep in the bed. He didn't want to wake her, so he went to the nanny. The door was locked. He checked through a hole and saw the dad in bed with the nanny. He went back to bed. The next morning, he went to his dad and said, "Dad i know what you mean now."

"You do? Tell me."

"OK, while capatilism is screwing the working class, the government is sound asleep, while the people are watching the future being pooped on!!!"

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - Bush and Cheney's Recent Dinner Date

Who Will be the Next President?

 
spacer
  One day George W. Bush and Dick Cheney walk into a diner. A waitress walks up to them and asks if she can take their order. Bush leans close to her and says, "Honey, can I have a quickie?"

The waitress is appalled and yells at the President about women's rights and storms away.

Cheney then says to Bush, "George, its pronounced "quiche"

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 24, 2005 - 5 Former Presidents are on a plane...

 
spacer
  Five presidents are on a plane: George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton. George Washington says, "I will make someone happy!" and throws a dollar bill off the plane.

Then Abraham Lincoln says, "I will make five people happy!" and throws 5 one dollar bills off the plane.

Then Thomas Jefferson says, "I will make 500 people happy!" and throws 500 one dollar bills off the plane.

Then George W. Bush says, "I will make the whole world happy!" and throws Bill Clinton off the plane.

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 7, 2005 - Did we invade Iraq because of stories of Rampage from 9/11

We are writing in this article some information that may cause termoil in the news.  Did you know... that rants included 9/10 emails sent to to FAA regarding 9/11 included information from an Indian native who heard rants of this 9-11 attack days before the invasion when sitting near 2 islamics reading directions (translations).  They included rants "about we do it for the Children... (Iraqi)."  Further notes says  "Iraqi´s pay us for their Blood."     

 

Democrats on Monday demanded that the Senate interview key government officials and exercise subpoena power while examining how the Bush administration used prewar Iraq intelligence in the run-up to the 2003 invasion.

 

As a bipartisan task force prepared for a week-long series of meetings on the intelligence question, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said the administration should be prepared to turn over important documents to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

 

"Now that the Republicans have agreed to conduct an investigation, the next step is making sure the right questions are answered," said the Nevada Democrat. 

 

But Republicans accuse their Democratic adversaries of using the Iraq war for political gain by suggesting that President George W. Bush and other administration officials may have misused intelligence to make their case for war.

 

Editors Note "Counterparts in this controversy say that Iraqi supporters also have tried to hide the truth and destroyed documentation."

 

"The Democrat leaders" latest accusation that the administration has manipulated intelligence and exaggerated the threat is nothing more than an effort to use the war in Iraq for political gain, and that is shameful," Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas said in a floor speech.  "This is why many believe the republicans are allowing this to go forward."  They believe by going forward the democrats will dis-grace themselves even further.  Worst case scenario is that neither party has anything to loose.  By the republicans, letting the investigation procede they have allowed themselves to be bi-partison in this investigation...  By agreeing that have nothing to loose...     

 

The Senate intelligence committee completed the first phase of its review of Iraq intelligence in July 2004 when it issued a scathing report about the quality of information that claimed Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons have ever been found. 

 

-Addition Beliefs speculate the Reports that some for these weapons where destroyed, lost, and even sold on the black market...  There is even speculation that several of these rpeorts are classsified because they will interfere in ongoing investigations.   

 

At the time, lawmakers promised a second phase to examine other issues including whether Bush administration officials misused intelligence to make its case for war. But that segment of the review has not been completed.

 

Last week, Democrats accused Republicans of stalling tactics and imposed a rare closed session to force the majority to complete the review.

 

The Senate set up a bipartisan task force of six senators to look into the second phase of the investigation in meetings that begin on Tuesday. The panel must report on the progress of the investigation by November 14.

 

Republicans say the second phase of the investigation was already proceeding before last week´s political confrontation. But Democrats accuse their Republican colleagues of trying to prevent a full investigation of the issues, saying that as recently as two weeks ago, an intelligence committee agenda for the remainder of 2005 showed no meetings on the probe.

 

Task force members including Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, the intelligence panel´s Republican chairman, will to try to find common ground between the parties on how the remaining probe should be conducted. 

 

Note:  We´re not sure how this really works...but isn´t there some intellegence clasified information regarding operatives (overseas) that these reports are based on.  This could get quite rough quickly and we the people may never know the truth because most of this is still under operatives.

 

Our Final Thought:

No matter what way this turns out, the American Public won´t know the truth, other than that the American dollar was wasted on aligations just before a political election.  Sounds About right to us... 

 

The Politically Correct Corner

 

 

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2005-11-08T001306Z_01_SCH800689_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-CONGRESS.xml

Comments (0) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 4, 2005 - Paris Rioting, and Trouble has just begun as Crime Surges. Travellers beware!

Looks like the night leads to trouble in Paris again!

 

AS THE night falls, the "troubles" start — and the pattern is always the same... 

 

Bands of youths in balaclavas start by setting fire to parked cars, break shop windows with baseball bats, wreck public telephones and ransack cinemas, libraries and schools. When the police arrive on the scene, the rioters attack them with stones, knives and baseball bats.

 

The police respond by firing tear-gas grenades and, on occasions, blank shots in the air. Sometimes the youths fire back — with real bullets.

 

These scenes are not from the West Bank but from 20 French cities, mostly close to Paris, that have been plunged into a European version of the intifada that at the time of writing appears beyond control.

 

The troubles first began in Clichy-sous-Bois, an underprivileged suburb east of Paris, a week ago. France´s bombastic interior minister, Nicholas Sarkozy, responded by sending over 400 heavily armed policemen to "impose the laws of the republic," and promised to crush "the louts and hooligans" within the day. Within a few days, however, it had dawned on anyone who wanted to know that this was no "outburst by criminal elements" that could be handled with a mixture of braggadocio and batons.

By Monday, everyone in Paris was speaking of "an unprecedented crisis." Both Sarkozy and his boss, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, had to cancel foreign trips to deal with the riots.

 

How did it all start? The accepted account is that sometime last week, a group of young boys in Clichy engaged in one of their favorite sports: stealing parts of parked cars.

 

Normally, nothing dramatic would have happened, as the police have not been present in that suburb for years.

The problem came when one of the inhabitants, a female busybody, telephoned the police and reported the thieving spree taking place just opposite her building. The police were thus obliged to do something — which meant entering a city that, as noted, had been a no-go area for them.

 

Once the police arrived on the scene, the youths — who had been reigning over Clichy pretty unmolested for years — got really angry. A brief chase took place in the street, and two of the youths, who were not actually chased by the police, sought refuge in a cordoned-off area housing a power pylon. Both were electrocuted.

 

Once news of their deaths was out, Clichy was all up in arms.

 

With cries of "God is great," bands of youths armed with whatever they could get hold of went on a rampage and forced the police to flee.

The French authorities could not allow a band of youths to expel the police from French territory. So they hit back — sending in Special Forces, known as the CRS, with armored cars and tough rules of engagement.

Within hours, the original cause of the incidents was forgotten and the issue jelled around a demand by the representatives of the rioters that the French police leave the "occupied territories." By midweek, the riots had spread to three of the provinces neighboring Paris, with a population of 5.5 million.

 

But who lives in the affected areas? In Clichy itself, more than 80 percent of the inhabitants are Muslim immigrants or their children, mostly from Arab and black Africa. In other affected towns, the Muslim immigrant community accounts for 30 percent to 60 percent of the population. But these are not the only figures that matter. Average unemployment in the affected areas is estimated at around 30 percent and, when it comes to young would-be workers, reaches 60 percent.

 

In these suburban towns, built in the 1950s in imitation of the Soviet social housing of the Stalinist era, people live in crammed conditions, sometimes several generations in a tiny apartment, and see "real French life" only on television.

 

The French used to flatter themselves for the success of their policy of assimilation, which was supposed to turn immigrants from any background into "proper Frenchmen" within a generation at most.

 

That policy worked as long as immigrants came to France in drips and drops and thus could merge into a much larger mainstream. Assimilation, however, cannot work when in most schools in the affected areas, fewer than 20 percent of the pupils are native French speakers.

 

France has also lost another powerful mechanism for assimilation: the obligatory military service abolished in the 1990s.

As the number of immigrants and their descendants increases in a particular locality, more and more of its native French inhabitants leave for "calmer places," thus making assimilation still more difficult.

 

In some areas, it is possible for an immigrant or his descendants to spend a whole life without ever encountering the need to speak French, let alone familiarize himself with any aspect of the famous French culture.

 

The result is often alienation. And that, in turn, gives radical Islamists an opportunity to propagate their message of religious and cultural apartheid.

 

Some are even calling for the areas where Muslims form a majority of the population to be reorganized on the basis of the "millet" system of the Ottoman Empire: Each religious community (millet) would enjoy the right to organize its social, cultural and educational life in accordance with its religious beliefs.

 

In parts of France, a de facto millet system is already in place. In these areas, all women are obliged to wear the standardized Islamist "hijab" while most men grow their beards to the length prescribed by the sheiks.

The radicals have managed to chase away French shopkeepers selling alcohol and pork products, forced "places of sin," such as dancing halls, cinemas and theaters, to close down, and seized control of much of the local administration.

A reporter who spent last weekend in Clichy and its neighboring towns of Bondy, Aulnay-sous-Bois and Bobigny heard a single overarching message: The French authorities should keep out.

 

"All we demand is to be left alone," said Mouloud Dahmani, one of the local "emirs" engaged in negotiations to persuade the French to withdraw the police and allow a committee of sheiks, mostly from the Muslim Brotherhood, to negotiate an end to the hostilities.

President Jacques Chirac and Premier de Villepin are especially sore because they had believed that their opposition to the toppling of Saddam Hussein in 2003 would give France a heroic image in the Muslim community.

That illusion has now been shattered — and the Chirac administration, already passing through a deepening political crisis, appears to be clueless about how to cope with what the Parisian daily France Soir has called a "ticking time bomb."

It is now clear that a good portion of France´s Muslims not only refuse to assimilate into "the superior French culture," but firmly believe that Islam offers the highest forms of life to which all mankind should aspire.

So what is the solution? One solution, offered by Gilles Kepel, an adviser to Chirac on Islamic affairs, is the creation of "a new Andalusia" in which Christians and Muslims would live side by side and cooperate to create a new cultural synthesis.

The problem with Kepel´s vision, however, is that it does not address the important issue of political power. Who will rule this new Andalusia: Muslims or the largely secularist Frenchmen?

Suddenly, French politics has become worth watching again, even though for the wrong reasons.

Amir Taheri, editor of the French quarterly "Politique internationale," is a member of Benador Associates.

 

Wow how bad can it get in that community!  Crime is high, jobs are down, and the fighting is just beginning?  I expect this to get a lot worse.

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (1) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

? Nov. 4, 2005 - Local officials said they had lost patience with the government-Politicians

Who Will be the Next President?

Politics gone bad as rioter head to the streets.  Reuters wrote a strong and quick article that you have to see.

 

AULNAY-SOUS-BOIS, France (Reuters) - Rioters set fire to hundreds of vehicles in impoverished suburbs of northeastern Paris in an eighth night of unrest that spread for the first time to other parts of the capital and other towns in France.

 

Local officials said they had lost patience with the government. Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin met his rival, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy, but kept a low profile after days of government squabbling over how to handle the crisis.

Police reported fewer clashes than previous nights and residents said the Eid al-Fitr holiday ending Ramadan may have calmed areas with large populations of Muslims of North African and black African origin.

But the rioting spread, with some attacks reported in western Paris suburbs -- including the torching of 23 buses at a depot -- and a few cars firebombed around Rouen in northern France, Dijon in the east and Marseille in the south.

The pattern of violence also changed, shifting from crowds clashing with police to targeted arson attacks, many against businesses and warehouses.

"I've had enough of this," said an angry woman wearing a headscarf in Aulnay-sous-Bois, a northeastern Paris suburb where a large warehouse was burned down overnight. "This must stop quickly. It's just not right."

Rioting among young men of North African and black African origin -- mostly locally born citizens who feel cheated by France's official promises of liberty, equality and fraternity -- began last week after two teenagers of African origin died while fleeing the police.

Lack of economic opportunity for youths in the worst affected areas is reflected in unemployment levels well above the national average.

Mayors from the riot-hit areas were also exasperated after Villepin briefed them on Thursday evening about an "action plan for the suburbs" he aims to present later this month.

"Many of us told him this isn't the time for an umpteenth plan," said Jean-Christophe Lagarde, mayor of Drancy. "All we need is one death and I think it will get out of control."

"IMMENSE VIOLENCE"

Justice Minister Pascal Clement was visibly shaken after being briefed about a handicapped woman in her 50s who was badly burned on Wednesday evening when rioters poured petrol on a city bus she was riding in and set it ablaze.

"This is immense violence," he told reporters in Bobigny, another town in the Seine Saint Denis department between central Paris and Charles de Gaulle airport that has been the worst hit. "I think all French are shocked to see things like this."

With the violence making headlines around the world, Foreign Ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei complained about foreign coverage of the riots -- without naming any media -- and said foreign tourists were not in danger.

"One is sometimes surprised at the international coverage of these events," he told reporters. "These are very serious incidents ... but we are very far from such a serious situation as some commentaries or television reports lead one to think."

Officials in Seine Saint Denis said 187 vehicles had been destroyed there overnight. French media said up to 600 vehicles were destroyed in the whole greater Paris region, including 23 buses at a terminal in Trappes in the southwest near Versailles.

Police detained 27 people and reported two injuries. They said a total of 1,260 vehicles had been destroyed in the greater Paris region since riots began last week, with more than half torched in Seine Saint Denis alone.

Security officials said the presence of hundreds of riot police had acted as a deterrent, but rioters nevertheless set fire to two textile warehouses, a bus depot and a school.

"Why a school, why a car? What can you say about such blind violence?" said one local mayor, Michel Beaumale.

FEAR VIOLENCE WILL SPREAD

Villepin spent Friday out of public view in his Matignon offices. Mayors who criticized him expressed concern the rioting could spread to other cities with similar suburbs that keep the poor far from rich city centers.

Manuel Valls, mayor of Evry south of the capital, said: "We're afraid that what's happening in Seine Saint Denis will spread. We have to give these people a message of hope."

Sarkozy, who sparked controversy earlier this week by dubbing protesting youth "scum," denounced the rioters but adopted a less strident tone.

"I am well aware that it will take some time to resolve these problems of the suburbs which have been left untouched for 30 years," he said during a visit to the Alpes-Maritime region.

Villepin and Sarkozy, whose bitter political rivalry has overshadowed the government's reaction, teamed up on Thursday to announce that restoring order was their "absolute priority."

Villepin blamed the riots on gangs he said terrorized residents and sought to keep police out of their districts, and vowed law and order would be restored.

In several interviews on Friday morning, conservative politicians said drug traffickers and Islamist militants were fanning the unrest, although they gave no details.

 

The Politically Correct Corner

Comments (2) :: Post A Comment! :: Permanent Link

About Me

This Web blog is aimed at 100% of Showing the Truth! Our writers will try to be politically correct as possible and will try their best to let the world know who, when, where, why, and more. Read The dirt and findout what the mudruckers are upto... Read articles on 9/11 aka 911 and more. See how thew 2 major political parties in the US have taken power and refuse to give it up as well. Presidential nominees will also show there skeletens in there closets on this site. If there is a skeleton in the closet we will find it! Or atleast what they are being accused of doing.

Links

? Home
? View my profile
? Archives
? Friends
? Email Me
? My Blog's RSS
? Sucker

Friends

? KingofGangland
? mrblog
? Jokester
? kathy
? Darts
? MickeyMouse
? usa1
? Yarmouth213
? bingogiant
? JobsRus
? bfallmann
? MedicalHealthNews

Login

My Control Panel
Page 1 of 2
Last Page | Next Page

Copyright 2010 News Jungle .us



BingoGiant.com - Free Bingo